INTENSE Mighty Ducks Fan Posted February 15, 2011 Report Share Posted February 15, 2011 I'm wondering if anyone with personal experience knows the sizing of a late 90s Nike 52 authentic in comparison to a CCM 550 XXL or a RBK Premier XXL. Personally the Premier fits perfectly for me (the material and quality is another story...). The 550 fits well but the sleeves seem an inch or so short. I know with the current EDGE jersies, an XXL is 56-60, but the older jersies were less tight. Anyway, any help is appreciated. Basically I wanna know if I can pull it off. I couldn't find much info on the Nikes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MountainKing Posted February 15, 2011 Report Share Posted February 15, 2011 Nikes run big...a 44 Nike fits like a 48 CCM.....so a 52 would probably be all good if you like XXL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdwsta4 Posted February 15, 2011 Report Share Posted February 15, 2011 I agree Nikes run big; not sure if I'd go so far as to say they're a whole size larger, but they're slightly larger than CCM authentics from the same era. Mostly in width. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MountainKing Posted February 15, 2011 Report Share Posted February 15, 2011 Yeah I probably over exaggerated by a bit..but when I hold my 44 Nike up to the 48 ultrafil it's really close. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob77ta Posted February 15, 2011 Report Share Posted February 15, 2011 I have two size 52 Nike Flyers authentics. They both measure roughly 27 and a 1/2 to 27 and 3/4 around the chest area. So I would say they are equivalent to an older CCM/Maska size 54. An Edge cut size 56 would be a tad smaller than the Nike 52. They are great jerseys. The 52 is a bit tight on me and the 56 is too big. I have a game worn Nike size 54 and I think that one would be the closest to an XXL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdwsta4 Posted February 16, 2011 Report Share Posted February 16, 2011 Figure I'd throw in some comparison shots top is a CCM ultrafil 48 while bottom is Nike air-knit 48. You can see how the Nike is slightly wider in the torso and arms top is CCM air-knit 52 while bottom is Nike air-knit 52. Same as above. and it's not a full size difference. here is a CCM ultrafil 52 compared to a Nike air-knit 48. it's worth noting that sleeve length is the exact same in both sizes as the CCM counterpart. Shame they weren't a little bit longer; I prefer the way 48's fit, but like the sleeve length of 52's. hope that helps! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MountainKing Posted February 16, 2011 Report Share Posted February 16, 2011 Wow not what I was expecting, I've never honestly put them up side by side but I swear the Nikes just feel roomier than the ultrafils, but they aren't that much roomier I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.